What makes it unethical for a Structural Engineer to verify/seal another Innovator's New Structural Designs? - innovator
Example: An innovative comes with an improved design and construction of buildings which were previously in the field of structural engineering, the science of physics and the construction industry.
The structures and structural engineers are currently working in the trade have more opportunities, developments and structural improvements that provide innovative new things to the public.
Innovations, new structural innovations add more structure, education and the possibility of contracting in the field of structural engineering.
The structural innovation reduces the cost of mounting structure of the frame and leads to a reduction of materials for the construction of a building or structure.
The structural innovation meets the three basic principles of statics, safety, feasibility and affordability.
The structural innovations, not otherwise get the exception Innovator's audit work, working prototypes, testing and recored shows absolute improvisationConference to present the design and erection of structures or the award with a record of innovative construction and sealing.
Innovation, which reduces structural damage and destruction of life, limb and property against natural disasters and the impact of the collision.
The innovation reduces the structural work, work and money it takes to respond, rescue and salvage work and the repair and rebuilding after tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, collisions and floods.
What is ethical to the permanent buildings and structures will be approved, do no harm to the public or the innovation and improvement can grow in the field of innovative structural engineering structures and grow to better check their products and services?
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Innovator What Makes It Unethical For A Structural Engineer To Verify/seal Another Innovator's New Structural Designs?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's innovative Registered Professional Engineer Civil / Structural Engineer?.
ReplyDeleteIf not, you should review your design and supervised by an approved prior to use each time you use.
If so, the design must still be reviewed by a professional register, and each time it is considered used.
This is how it is, and applies to all areas of engineering and engineering work.
Also, just because the new design is an improvement does not mean that everyone has to use.
If the method does not appear in the textbooks of the construction, steel consstruction requirement is not necessary that each of the new method must be used.